On Christmas Day 2025, the United States carried out airstrikes against Islamic State–linked militants in northwest Nigeria. The operation marked a rare and highly visible use of U.S. military force inside Nigeria and immediately raised questions about why it happened, how it was coordinated, and what it means going forward.
Here’s a clear, no-nonsense breakdown of what we know.
What Actually Happened
- Date: December 25, 2025
- Location: Northwest Nigeria, specifically parts of Sokoto State
- Target: Militants linked to the Islamic State
- Who carried it out: The U.S. military, under U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM)
- How: Precision airstrikes using long-range weapons
- Casualties: U.S. officials said multiple militants were killed; no confirmed public information on civilian casualties
The strikes were publicly acknowledged by the U.S. president, who described them as decisive and necessary.
Why the U.S. Launched the Strikes
According to U.S. officials, the operation was carried out for several reasons:
- To disrupt Islamic State activity in northwest Nigeria
- To prevent further attacks on civilians, including attacks targeting Christian communities
- To support Nigeria’s counter-terrorism efforts, which have struggled against multiple extremist groups
- To signal continued U.S. commitment to fighting Islamic State affiliates globally
The message from Washington was clear: Islamic State–linked groups, even outside the Middle East, remain legitimate U.S. military targets.
Nigeria’s Position
Nigeria’s government acknowledged that the strikes took place and confirmed security cooperation with the United States.
Key points from Nigeria’s response:
- The operation was described as coordinated, not unilateral
- Nigerian officials emphasized respect for national sovereignty
- The government rejected framing the conflict as purely religious, stressing that terrorism affects all communities
- Nigeria reiterated its commitment to protecting civilians and maintaining religious coexistence
While the cooperation was confirmed, Nigerian officials were careful to manage domestic sensitivities around foreign military action on Nigerian soil.
The Broader Context
Extremist Violence in Nigeria
- Nigeria has faced more than a decade of insurgency from groups such as Boko Haram and Islamic State–aligned factions. In 2025 alone, the violence led to over 3,000 civilian casualties and displaced approximately 200,000 people, emphasizing the urgent need for effective counter-terrorism measures.
- Violence has included mass kidnappings, attacks on villages, bombings, and targeted killings
- Northwest Nigeria has seen growing instability, with militant groups expanding beyond traditional conflict zones
U.S. Involvement in West Africa
- The U.S. has long supported regional counter-terrorism through training, intelligence sharing, and logistics. Diplomatic and development initiatives have also played a key role in fostering stability. Programs to improve governance, promote economic development, and address the root causes of extremism show the U.S. commitment to holistic approaches. Direct U.S. airstrikes inside Nigeria are rare, making this operation notable, but they are part of a broader strategy that uses both military and non-military tools.
- The strike reflects broader U.S. concern about extremist groups spreading across the Sahel and West Africa
Criticism and Controversy
The airstrikes were not universally welcomed.
Critics raised concerns including:
- Sovereignty: Arguments that foreign airstrikes, even with cooperation, set a dangerous precedent
- Civilian risk: Worries about collateral damage in fragile regions.
- Escalation: Fears that foreign military action could provoke retaliation or widen the conflict
- Does selective air power deter or invite retaliation? This question invites reflection on the strategic trade-offs involved.
Some Nigerian activists and political figures publicly condemned the strikes, calling them reckless or imperialistic.
What This Means Going Forward
The strikes may signal several things:
- Deeper U.S. involvement in West African counter-terrorism
- Continued reliance on targeted military action rather than large troop deployments
- Increased political debate inside Nigeria about the role of foreign partners
- Ongoing instability in regions where extremist groups remain active
Whether this becomes a one-time operation or part of a broader pattern remains to be seen.
Bottom Line
- The U.S. carried out airstrikes against Islamic State–linked militants in northwest Nigeria on December 25, 2025
- The strikes were framed as a response to extremist violence and attacks on civilians
- Nigeria confirmed security cooperation but emphasized sovereignty and national unity
- The operation highlights how global counter-terrorism now increasingly extends into West Africa
This was not just a military event. It was a political signal to militants, allies, and critics about how far the U.S. is willing to go in confronting extremist threats beyond traditional battlefields.